Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tekel Birası


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Tekel Birası

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

What makes this Turkis brewery/brand(?) notable per GNG/WP:NCOMPANY? In my BEFORE I can't find any good refs for it; though some may exist in Turkish - perhaps some Turkish speaking Wikipeidans could comment here and rescue this article if possible with reliable, in-depth sources? There is no interwiki to Turkish Wikipedia, so I couldn't use their article for additional insight. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 00:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  00:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  00:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Keep As the article says, the first beer to be brewed in Turkey and produced for many years under a state monopoly so the national brand of beer. Discussed as the subject of articles in major national newspapers here, here and here. Also discussed in a book in the history of Anatolian beers, this book on monopolies in a Turkey, and elsewhere. Mccapra (talk) 02:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - Based on a rudimentary Google translate examination of the sourced Mccapra provided, there does appear to be sufficient significant coverage for this product. Perhaps someone who is able to examine the sources without relying on a translation program can chime in, but it looks like a keeper to me.  Rorshacma (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.