Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tekena harry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:27, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Tekena Harry

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Was dePRODed by creator. Concen was: ''Research fails to produce independent, reliable 3rd party sources in number, depth, and scope to assert notability per WP:ACADEMIC. (This has been changed from BLPPROD to PROD because a link was added).'' With  the exception of one university staff  profile, none of the sources appear to  contain  any  biographical  information pertaining  to  the subject. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, reluctantly. He is a scientist with multiple publications about AIDS, but he is always one of a long string of authors, and the publications do not appear to be heavily cited. I could not find any information about his government positions. This may be mostly due to a lack of online information about Nigeria rather than to a lack of notability of the subject. I would gladly change my opinion if shown evidence of notability. --MelanieN (talk) 16:07, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.