Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tekken:Unlimited Cruise 2nd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted. Materialscientist (talk) 12:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Tekken:Unlimited Cruise 2nd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced crystal bol The Banner talk 18:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and in line with the WP:PROD already proposed once: No content other than lists, but doesn't meet MOS:LIST; appears (hard to tell, again, no content) to refer to something a year or three in the future (WP:CRYSTAL).  Cheers, LindsayHello 17:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, clear case of WP:CRYSTAL. Cavarrone 18:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. What in the world is this... Ansh666 03:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete SPAM db-spam, CONTEXT db-context, NOTABILITY db-event -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 00:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * db-nonsense? I have reverted your addition of three speedy deletion requests. The Banner talk 01:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It has no mention of notability, it does not reveal its context, and it is promotional, therefore it qualifies under all three deletion criteria. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, this is why it doesn't. For one, if there was "no context", how could it be "promotional"? A1 doesn't apply here since the article isn't short by any means and you can tell what it's about from the sections, category, etc. It doesn't look promotional at all, and definitely not G11-able - it's more documenting every single thing to do with the anime series than explicitly or even implicitly trying to sell it. A7 comes the closest but doesn't apply because this doesn't fit under the categories ("individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events"). Ansh666 06:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * From my reading of the article: I couldn't tell it was about an anime series, there was nothing there showing that except the category, which could easily be spurious (how can it be an anime series if there are playable characters?). It was promoting some event in 2014, and the author's name was attached as one of the organizers (Vhenjun Valencia and ), but just what it was, was not explained, so no context. And there is definitely nothing about notability in it. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 11:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I would second a context-based speedy. Not sure about spam or notability, though. There's really not enough context (!) for me to tell. --BDD (talk) 15:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * That doesn't even make sense...this isn't even close to a speedy. Ansh666 01:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment either this article gets rewritten or it should get deleted, because article is just a list... BrandonWu (talk) 03:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.