Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tekkoshocon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Withdrawing nomination, as sources have been found - and added to article! I'm not sure why I didn't find those, but it's all sorted now, thank you all  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 20:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Tekkoshocon

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I can't find significant coverage at reliable and independent sources, and no evidence that AnimeCons.com meets that standard. GNews has minor coverage. I do not see that this meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and that it would be better placed either at Anime-Wiki or Animepedia.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:54, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 03:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep the convention received lengthy articles in the June 2006 issue of Newtype USA and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. This is enough to demonstrate that the convention passes WP:NOTE. —Farix (t &#124; c) 17:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There are some other articles I've found from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. —Farix (t &#124; c) 17:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Clicking the Google news archive search at the top of the AFD shows results straight away. The Post-Gazette is the first one.  There are several articles in Pittsburgh Live.  I only read the first one listed, and it clearly notable coverage.   D r e a m Focus  10:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above, sources have been found so it does pass WP:Notability now, the original concern for this AfD. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.