Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tekla Juniewicz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Tekla Juniewicz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Standard supercentenarian bio. Fails WP:BIO1E, WP:NOPAGE, WP:ANYBIO. As with many other such articles which have previously been deleted, no worthwhile encyclopedic information that is not contained in List of supercentenarians by continent or similar. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 08:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Poland. North America1000 08:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. While she is notable only for one thing (i.e. living long), during her life, she was covered by mainstream Polish media (Dziennik Zachodni, ) and her funeral was attended by Polish Prime Minister, a fact that was covered by more media: https://polskieradio.pl/art7789_3024535],, . While this does seem to be WP:ONEVENTish, I think that at minimum this should be redirected to the mentioned List of supercentenarians by continent and not deleted. PS. Also, it appears she was not just a "Standard supercentenarian", but the oldest or second oldest person alive for a while or such. So I guess she was one of the "top" supercentenarian... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * A redirect would be expected. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 22:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I guess her notability is of a bit different type from other similar "oldest people" articles existed in the past. At least she is more noteable than Maria Giuseppa Robucci, who her article is still not deleted. She is the oldest person in the history of the European country which had 40 million people, and she was visited by the country's prime minister, are a remarkable achievement. The claim that she was "being the longest-lived in the history of Poland" is backed by appropriate strong reliable and verifiable sources that are unquestionably about the subject.--Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Keep. This page is very nice and I feel bad for the poor author to have his eloquently written page taken down. ❤ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.200.180.226 (talk) 21:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per Derby's reasoning, and my own, she fails WP:BIO1E, WP:NOPAGE and WP:ANYBIO. She is in no way more notable than any of the multitude of other supercentenarian articles that have already been deleted and has achieved nothing other than having lived to an extremely old age. MattSucci  (talk) 15:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

The article is good, well written, concise and important. I do not see what there is to gain from deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.31.39.140 (talk) 13:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as the Polish sources used pass WP:DEPTH. I mean... she is the oldest ever verified person in Poland which is something I guess. There are also sources that say she was visited by the Polish prime minister who later attended her funeral. Heads of government don't usually visit a person one to one unless its for a good reason. Also agreed that at the very least the page should be redirected to List of supercentenarians by continent where her name is present. I know WP:OSE, but I want to point to Elizabeth Bolden and say there might be a bit of WP:BIAS in general towards non English sources. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Breaking from my normal tradition of !voting delete on these kinds of articles. I believe that these good faith, non-English sources actually do bring a bit of notability and depth to this person that do not occur with other "oldest people" article attempts. Cheers. Wime  Pocy  17:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per (and nothing weak about it). This person has good enough coverage to warrant an article, and the existing one looks alright. Renerpho (talk) 05:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.