Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teko (Company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Teko (Company)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No credible claim of significance. A7 tag removed by first-time editor. Sources are primary, witten by ghostwriters in stead of reporters and deprecated per WP:FORBESCON Vexations (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * , the editor who removed the A7 tag was a sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigations/Ransara Jey. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. The sources are either from profiles of the company, or are from unreliable news sources. Furthermore, the article reads like an advertisement, which is in violation of WP:PROMO. OctaviusSlockpit (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-reliable sourcecs that fails in WP:GNG. SwashWafer (talk) 16:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources cover Nathan Testa not the company significantly. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. Redoryxx (talk) 04:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - this company clearly does not meet WP:NCORP; excellent nomination Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I am the initial creator of . I had no idea about WP:NCORP, WP:GNG or WP:PROMO when creating this article. I am now aware of the mentioned guidelines/policies and I acknowledge that this article doesn't meet the required criteria. --Ransara Jey (talk) 00:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * - thank you for your comment. I sincerely hope that this does not discourage you from editing Wikipedia. There are many notable topics that require help from volunteers such as ourselves and your contributions are welcome. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete sources cited do not prove notability of the subject. Luciapop (talk) 07:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.