Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tekxeon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 09:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Tekxeon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORG. Antigng (talk) 03:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No indication of notability per WP:ORG, google search revealed that the only reliable sources to be found were self published, ie linkedin. Pishcal  — ♣ 06:42, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:CSD applies, article "does not indicate why its subject is important or significant". Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 08:21, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable sources given, much less any showing that WP:ORGDEPTH criteria are met.--Rpclod (talk) 12:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. The entry looks like something pulled from company literature.  ThurstonHowell3rd (talk) 14:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unfortunately, the article is unsourced and my searches at News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary found nothing in the slightest to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  18:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.