Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telangana State Health Profile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moved to Draft:Telangana State Health Profile. Most of those advocating deletion would allow recreation at a later time. Draft space is the appropriate place to house the article for improvement in the interim. bd2412 T 20:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Telangana State Health Profile

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has very little WP:GNG on it's own and seems to be written more a promotional article then an informative one. At best, a couple of lines can be merged into Kalvakuntla Chandrashekhar Rao under the CM section. Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  We Are All  Here   talk  00:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  12:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep -- Another misunderstanding of WP:GNG. This article already cites one article from The Hindu, India's paper of record, and two from Telangana Today, a regional newspaper from this major region in India.  This in itself is enough to satisfy the GNG. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 13:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge--Per the reasons described by nom.Every government scheme launched in any state, manages to incur levels of coverage, as over here. ~ Winged Blades Godric 04:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 12:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete without prejudice to later recreation (and of course userfy if someone wants to work on it later). I don't think we have specific notability guidelines on "government schemes" and strictly speaking, WP:GNG is weakly met with the 3 sources provided (weakly since they are basically all secondarily reporting on one event, namely the announcement). However, we also have pretty longstanding practice that wp is not a crystal ball, and for instance festivals, concerts, albums and the like don't get an article before they actually happen. Governments around the world make announcements of intent all the time, and it's not realistic to suppose we'd want to have an article on anything announced in such a way, just because there was some immediate reporting of the announcement. So I say delete for now, but I would anticipate that if this indeed goes ahead, there will soon by substantial, lasting, coverage worthy of an article. Martinp (talk) 11:52, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 16:40, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete but allow recreation later. I mostly agree with what wrote above. This is a government scheme which has not been been formally launched. Although an initial announcement has been made, there are no details as to what constitutes it. There have been many government initiatives in India and some of them such as the Aadhar, National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)and Swaccha Bharat Abhiyan are notable. However, the notable schemes receive a lot of press coverage. This scheme seems to be simply an initial announcement with no details as to when it will be implemented. I suggest we wait till we have more reliable information. --DreamLinker (talk) 18:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.