Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeleDNA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete.The page under discussion has been noncontroversially speedy deleted under A7 on 14:07, 2 November 2016. (non-admin closure) Aru@baska ❯❯❯  Vanguard 12:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

TeleDNA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

what is remain after speedy deletion and tagging is "One Line". Not at all encyclopedia material. Only a waste Wikipedia links remain for such company. Speedy delete now. This article has really nothing to write about or talk. Non-notable company. Only made for customers or employee for online reputation. standards Popular media references are being used to create an article here. Light2021 (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I looked but could not find sufficient reliable sources that speak to this company's notability. Safehaven86 (talk) 19:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Just a promotional snare at Wikipedia's expense. Why do these even require special consideration? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:445:8002:BC40:D881:6C8:35AC:EA7C (talk) 20:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:56, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:56, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.