Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeleNav (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Never close on one !vote but GNG is clearly met, Obvious Keep imho (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 21:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

TeleNav
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches found nothing better than a few press releases and passing mentions and none of was even minimally solid in-depth coverage. It's also worth noting this was deleted as a three sentences unsourced article in 2006 (but no symmetrical so G4 is not applicable) and also speedied as G11 in 2010. SwisterTwister  talk  19:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - The company passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , , , , , , , , , . Some sources cover the company's products, which is fine per WP:PRODUCT, which states, "If a company is notable, information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy." These sources were all found using the Google News and Google Books links atop this discussion. North America1000 22:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.