Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telejano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. (And no, prod doesn't count for G4.) &mdash; Scientizzle 16:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Telejano

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has a rather strange history. It was first prodded back on April 25th 2008 with concerns around a lack of sources to demonstrate notability, and deleted on May 1st. The article was recently recreated, still with no third-party sources, only it has a primarysources tag dating from March 2008 added to it. I've searched for good quality sources from third-party publications, but have been unable to find any. Additionally, the author of the article, is also mentioned as the developer of the software in the body of the article, creating a conflict of interest. Gazimoff Write Read 13:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete ignoring the COI as it isn't a valid reason for deletion the article still seems to fail the notability/verifiability criteria because of the lact of sourcing. Although there are 11,900Ghits on the word and most seem to be about this engine the sources appear to be blogs and such. There are no GNews hits at all (even searching on all dates). Someone else might be able to find better sources that I missed hence the "Weak". Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment- if an article was recreated after deletion by discussion, it should be CSDed per G4. But we need to confirm that this article is substantially identical to the deleted version. Nom: do you have a copy of the deleted version?- Samuel  Tan  09:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, a PROD isn't a deletion discussion. I think only those things that have gone through AfD (or its forebears) counts for G4. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * oh yeah... forgot that prod is a quick slide down the garage chute with your mouth duct taped. - Samuel  Tan  04:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;Sean Whitton / 11:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, apparently no reliable sources exist. What we have is by far not enough. Huon (talk) 14:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage from reliable sources on Google (web, books, and scholar) can be found for this game modfication.  It is simply not notable at all.  Jappalang (talk) 09:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.