Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teleperformance Philippines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. G11 completed by Jimfbleak (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:15, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Teleperformance Philippines

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is an article that was clearly authored by the company it talks about for promotional purposes. Teleperformance is noteworthy but already has its own article. No need to create a new one for its subsidiaries also. Gnkgr (talk) 00:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Philippines. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly PROMO. Bullet points of business accomplishments with no real discussion around why they're important. Oaktree b (talk) 04:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, clearly promotional, falls under G11. Fails WP:NPOV  Brachy 08  (Talk) 04:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:NCORP and written in a highly promotional tone . Kpg  jhp  jm  04:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I also noticed that the person who created this is probs a member of Teleperformance Philippines.  Brachy 08  (Talk) 06:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Qualifies for G11 speedy as pure promo that would need to fully be rewritten. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete --- Tito Pao (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, should have qualified under G11 and G12 a long time ago (see relevant entry here). Teleperformance's operations plus CSR programs (if any) in the Philippines can be mentioned in the Teleperformance article. -Ian Lopez @ 14:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: WP:G11. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 04:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Ugh. Strictly speaking we don't have a CSD for blatant UPE that's been stubified to have no content and I can't find anything that isn't more likely a backwards copy but I'm going to tag it for G11 and the user page draft as G7 and U5. Speedy delete, snow. Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.