Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Televailable


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Televailable
The result was closed delete per WP:SNOW. ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 01:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This should have been deleted long ago. Word was "coined" by a Mr. Curtis in "early 2007" and only used by him. Creator of page also named Curtis. Non-notable, non-existent word Keeper76 19:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. As per nom. -- En dl ess Dan  19:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Wow. How did that thing stay here for 6 months? Obvious delete per nom, would not even qualify for an entry on wiktionary, much less wikipedia, as it is clearly a made-up word.--Bigtimepeace | talk |  contribs 20:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - How did anyone miss this. -- Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 20:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism. I'd like to point out the attempt at phonetic spelling, too. At least use IPA! Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per norm. Chris! my talk 23:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Patent case of WP:MADEUP. (Not a true reason under CSD, true, but I don't think this is going to be a heavily disputed AfD).  B figura  (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete But congratulations to Joseph Curtis of Grantsville, Maryland, for having the guts to do the article and for keeping this on Wikipedia from March 22 onward.  I had a similar dream about the word "forenot", which means "If it had not have been for..."  WTG Joe.  Mandsford 01:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete WP:NEO ff m  16:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.