Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Televised sex line


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Televised sex line

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a good case of WP:TNT. Chock full of original research, promo and directory material. Would take a significant rewrite and would likely be a few sentence stub but as it's currently incoherent and a honeypot for spam, this seems to be the best option. As a side note, all the results I've seen in my WP:BEFORE are pretty much just mirrors. Praxidicae (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like an essay fueled by original research and primary sources. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  20:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. The text simply has no place in Wikipedia. No encyclopaedic purpose whatsoever. Nothing remotely notable about the subject. The whole thing's reeking of personal work. Show mercy and deliver it from its woes. -The Gnome (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.