Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telos (Doctor Who)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cyberman. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Telos (Doctor Who)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Same as Mondas, this topic fails WP:GNG. Coverage is limited to in-universe summaries and contextual mentions in relation to other plot elements. TTN (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Cyberman - The article has zero reliable sources, and is comprised almost entirely of plot information. Searching for sources does not actually turn up much in reliable sources - its mentioned here and there in the context of describing the plots of Dr. Who related products, but that's about it.  A reasonable redirect target exists, so that should be done, but there is nothing here that should be merged, considering none of it is sourced.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. The article has been worked on substantially in the past 15+ years and is a useful resource for those interested in the subject. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't see how WP:IAR is able to be invoked for a minor plot element simply due to the length of its existence. There are plenty of plot elements that have skipped through the gaps over Wikipedia's existence. This is useful in the same way a Fandom article is useful, good for fans but irrelevant to a general encyclopedia. TTN (talk) 19:23, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to Cyberman, pure Wikia material that fails GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cyberman. There are no sources here but it is mentioned at that article. Archrogue (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Cyberman. No evidence of stand-alone notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cyberman - very clearly lacks WP:SIGCOV on its own Spiderone  11:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cyberman.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.