Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telsonic Ultrasonics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (soft) slakr  \ talk / 12:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Telsonic Ultrasonics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment I think the importance should be, so that the author should quickly find the arguments in favor of retaining article. Shad in Net 01:30, 19 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shad Innet (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ( Talk ) 14:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe delete - Shad Innet's comments are vague about clarifying its notability so my extensive searches found results and I'm not sure if it is enough for notability; here, here, here and here. I'm voting more delete unless other people think this is in fact notable. SwisterTwister   talk  04:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.