Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telsonic Ultrasonics (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Telsonic Ultrasonics
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP with no substantial coverage outside of specialist publications. Previous AFD closed as soft delete but contested by a paid editor. SmartSE (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 04:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 04:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Not sure as this needs attention from familiar people and people with access to possibly non-English or otherwise challenging sources and my searches found nothing particularly good aside from this, this and this. SwisterTwister   talk  07:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Searches did not turn up enough to meet notability guideline.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.