Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Permastub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Relocating this deletion request from AfD to TfD. (non-admin closure) ☾Loriendrew☽   ☏(ring-ring)  01:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Permastub

 * – ( View AfD View log )

In my opinion, this template should be deleted because what do you want to inform with a sentence "however there are not enough verifiable sources on it, or it is a finished article." for an article indicated as a stub, where a stub means an obviously short but usable article? There may be very short and at the same time comprehensive article, but let's not confuse "you can't expand it" with "I don't know how to expand it". In addition, the template is unused--Ḥdiddān 16:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.