Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template Cowprotected

Template:Cowprotected and Template:Cowinclusion was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Nonsense. RickK 05:04, Jul 17, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * The cows of Danzig/Gdansk are beyond our help - delete. Secretlondon 05:08, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * HOW DARE YOU LIST DANZIG BEFORE GDANSK. Delete. - David Gerard 09:31, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd say "add to BJAODN," but the templates aren't really...funny.  --Ardonik 05:47, Jul 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Just as information, these are for use by the "wikipedianism" entry in you have two cows. It wasn't my idea to move them out...  Pakaran. 14:41, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Cute. Delete anyway.  Moo. - Lucky 6.9 04:50, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. They're part of a joke.  See .  --Eequor 18:21, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Being part of a Wikipedia in-joke is a reason to delete, not to keep - David Gerard 21:57, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Agree with David Gerard. Additionally, you don't actually need real templates to make a joke. It's not like having it show up with double curly braces on edit is funny. Delete both. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 01:48, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)