Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple Beth Sholom (Cherry Hill, New Jersey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy deleted as a copyright violation of. Fram (talk) 09:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Temple Beth Sholom (Cherry Hill, New Jersey)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This appears to be a run of the mill Synagogue that fails to have any specific notability per WP:NONPROFIT or WP:GNG. I tried to find any evidence of it being a nationally famous local organization, but failed to. I have also found no evidence of particularly unique longevity, size of membership, major achievements, or prominent scandals. In terms of GNG, I am unable to find significant reliable source coverage for any general factors either. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy delete individual places of worship are not notable, this article is not referenced at all. It has no claim to fame let alone references to back it up. Move to a Judaism in x state article perhaps?Yotemordis (talk) 23:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note. User:Yotemordis is blocked as a sock puppet of User:Thisbites. --Lambiam 01:44, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Jayjg (talk) 01:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep as there are at least 65 Conservative Judaism synagogues like this in Category:Conservative synagogues in the United States. Synagogues are not infinite in number (there probably are not more than about one thousand Conservative Judaism Temples in North America) and they are not required to have "national" fame to be notable. The nominator should note WP:DONOTDEMOLISH, WP:CHANCE, WP:COMPETENCE especially by nominating three synagogues in a row for deletion rather than first seeking input from the articles' creators as well as from seasoned Judaic editors at WP:TALKJUDAISM. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 08:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * NOTE related discussions regarding User excessive deletionism at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. IZAK (talk) 09:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per IZAK's reasoning. Tinton5 (talk) 17:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.