Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple for Peace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. no arguments for deletion aside nom JForget  00:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Temple for Peace

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Declined A7 (did not fit the categories), but still fails WP:GNG. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Vajradhara-Ling, since it's the temple/project of that congregation, and is already discussed on that page. First Light (talk) 23:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There are enough good sources now to show that it's notable by itself. First Light (talk) 02:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This article is lacking source, I will therefore translate the french article, and will look for new references. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added a number of references and information to the page and I propose it to be kept as an article. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 14:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep It's a little bit crystall-ball-ish since the temple is still under construction, but there seems to be adequate sourcing (including a UPI article when it was visited by the Dalai Lama). Its annual festival also attracts coverage. --MelanieN (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.