Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tempo (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nomination withdrawn. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Tempo (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 10:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 10:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment: There is a review in DVD Talk. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 10:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete DVD Talk review is fine, but that's all there is. I can't find anything. Gnewpapers has some links to a film from 1986, but that's not this film. 13:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Oaktree b (talk) 19:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment found this review  Donald D23   talk to me  14:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Excellent work to Somebodyidkfkdt and Donaldd23. I consider both DVD Talk and Contactmusic.com to be suitable and reliable sources/reviews.  I therefore withdraw this nomination. The Film Creator (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I would also like to add that Christopher Null, who wrote the Contactmusic.com review, is a notable film critic. The Film Creator (talk) 16:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.