Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Commandments for Drivers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep as a bad-faith nomination, without comment on the notability of the subject. MastCell Talk 22:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Ten Commandments for Drivers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)  Another list of unrelated topics, POV of pastor of non-notable church, previous AfDs on similar listcruft from J. Ratzinger, Username Benedict16.  Does not cite to any recognized source "Assoc Press" or alt. "Assok Press" not found in Google search of publishers, possible hoax.

Also AfDs proposed for deletion: "Ten Commandments" (purely opinion oriented list) and "Luther's 95 Theses" (Wikipedia is not a bulletin board for speculative ideas). WP:NOT Joe Rat 21:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Close without prejudice to future AfD. This is not what AfD is about. -- Charlene 22:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Huh? Is this AFD some kind of trolling?  I think we can safely conclude that Pope Benedict XVI is the spiritual leader of a very notable church, that the Associated Press exists, and that the Ten Commandments and The 95 Theses are important religious documents regardless of whether one believes in them or not.  At best, this is a bad-faith AFD; at worst, it's disruption.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 22:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've put in a request for an admin to look at this at WP:ANI. -- Charlene 22:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This is a real news event, which you would know if you were to read a paper or watch CNN. Mandsford 22:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Close - either 100% wrongheaded, or disruptive. Calling the Pope a "pastor of non-notable church" leads me to believe the second.  --Haemo 22:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Trolling.  --Dynaflow   babble  22:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Any opportunity this AFD may have had to have been taken seriously was eliminated by the sarcastic approach. That said, article will be tagged for notability. --Dhartung | Talk 22:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.