Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten O Nine Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Ten O Nine Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable record label. DimaG (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete -- no notability demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 02:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I've edited this article a bit in the past, and waited to see if the company would eventually exhibit notability, but they haven't. Their sole claim to fame is that James Burton played on one release, and that's not sufficient.  Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 23:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.