Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Practical Points


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 03:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Ten Practical Points

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A list of principles of a non-notable organisation, does not belong in an encyclopedia. Quasihuman (talk) 22:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

The principles are notable. They are noted in the refrences which I have supplied on the bottom of the page. --Avellinijr (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Duplicate of Twelve Traditions which link to the main AA article. Should be speedied. scope_creep (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability. The "references" are links to publications of the organisation, and are not independent sources. I can find no evidence that "Ten Practical Points" is used in this particular sense anywhere by anyone except in these publications of this organisation. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No external sources. Internal publications of the organisation do not show notability. LK (talk) 02:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.