Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten York


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  00:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Ten York

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Another condo tower in a city with many. Fails WP:NBUILD. Only cursory mention in the media. Website UrbanToronto is commercial site promoting development and it barely mentions this tower. No content, or descriptive information available on its architecture or anything notable. Alaney2k (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, I've improved and expanded the article. Passes WP:GNG. The comment that UrbanToronto "barely mentions this tower" simply isn't true, I found plenty of articles, some of which I've cited as sources. Project is interesting for its distinctive triangular shape, triangular swimming pool, height (at 224 metres tall), and its development on a tiny plot. UrbanToronto is perfectly adequate as a source in my opinion. NemesisAT (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment UT is a site covering development. This is not general notability to have it discussed there. Alaney2k (talk) 15:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seemingly enough in-depth coverage available to make it pass WP:GNG:, , , , . - Tristan Surtel (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Some routine mentions. Star is real estate section. As for the others. If anything, the transaction with the city seems to be the focus. Alaney2k (talk) 15:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The transaction is certainly part of most of those articles, but a lot is being told about the building itself as well. I am also not sure why being in the real estate section would disqualify the Star article, a very in-depth source; the newspaper has to put it in some section and real estate seems like the most obvious choice. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, as it received enough coverage to meet GNGJackattack1597 (talk) 21:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.