Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten commandments

Ten commandments
Somebody with an axe to grind grinding it in the Wikipedia namespace. BJAODN at best (although I didn't find it that humorous). [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 04:18, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 04:36, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Nonsense from a vandal. Delete. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 04:53, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, deleting it only fuels the cabal fire for the tin-foil hat crowd. Let it stay and people can judge how seriously to take them for themselves. Shane King 07:05, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Well, it does pretend to be "Wikipedia Official Policy" (according to its category listing at least), and has the potential to scare off newbies who don't know what Stalin's face looks like, and maybe some who do. [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 07:13, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * This is decidedly not official policy; everyone knows that we of the Cabal don't ever write these rules down. Seriously though: transwiki to meta. &#8212;No-One Jones 07:15, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Improve, make it interesting and transwiki to meta. utcursch 09:00, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete or turn it into a rant so obnoxious that no one outside the patological paranoid commmunity will take it seriously :-7 - Skysmith 09:35, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Troll. Delete. Kosebamse 11:22, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * This pretends to be policy, delete or move to some obvious joke page, here or on meta. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 12:05, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Trolling. Meta already has the Cabal article so I don't think we should bother to transwiki this. jni 12:58, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Gee, someone's very unhappy.  Trollery. Geogre 14:56, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete rant by a sock puppet. Rossami (talk) 16:35, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Does the green rooster smoke cubebs in Provence? Lauren Caball 16:40, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, when the subway tokens rise against the yen. Inner Cycloid 16:42, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * QBOUX PQMCU PWSGU MEUQS PZNWH Cryptozoan 16:44, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Shhh... double secret Delete it and don't let anybody find out that it's gone. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 17:22, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * We don't tolerate it around here when someone impersonates another individual user and puts words in their mouth to make them look bad. Why should we be obligated to do differently when someone's impersonating other users collectively by using the "Wikipedia:" namespace in bad faith?  Sure, it's clearly satirical.  I don't see that as much of a defense. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:13, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, borderline vandal Wyss 22:05, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I'd rather just push it further into the realm of absurdity, myself. I've done my part... -- Jmabel | Talk 07:22, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unfunny troll. (IMHO the worst kind of troll!)  P Ingerson 11:50, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to a subpage of the author's user page. - Andre Engels 10:27, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to BJAODN or meta. Andris 10:30, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * I'm too new here to to make an informed decision, but User:Mirv and User:Jmabel made edits that did a lot to take the harsh edge off. Maybe more of the same would show the author how trivial he/she is around here. [[User:Hydnjo|Hydnjo\talk]] 00:21, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * 'Delete Funny, though. Move text to meta or to sub user page.--Zappaz 04:15, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Would be funny, except that I think the creator of the article was serious. Jayjg 23:57, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)