Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten for Grandpa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Ten for Grandpa

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable 8-minute short film. All of the coverage online is essentially the director promoting his own short film. No reliable secondary sources that are unconnected to the director's submissions. Argles Barkley (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Argles Barkley (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing even close to showing that this is a notable film.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Films are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist — the notability test for films requires some evidence of significance, such as notable film awards and/or critical analysis by professional film critics in media. But there's none of that here, and even on a ProQuest search for 13-year-old coverage that might not have googled I still only get a couple of glancing namechecks of its existence in event calendar listings, which isn't enough. Bearcat (talk) 12:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.