Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenacity (textile strength)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. The nomination is only suggesting a merge, which can be discussed on an article talk page. North America1000 23:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Tenacity (textile strength)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor, whose rationale is below (from my talk page). On the merits, no opinion - though it does seem that a merge would be a good option, here. If not to Specific strength, then perhaps to some other target? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 16:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Merge Tenacity (textile strength) into specific strength. The two are the same thing, also the Tenacity page is a stub. Also, what is quasi-dimensionless supposed to mean? Tenacity should be turned into a section in specific strength. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.213.249 (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge as per above. --OpenFuture (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.