Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tender Vittles (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Tender Vittles
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable product does not meet our criteria for inclusion. Survived VfD years ago before based on editors shopping knowledge. Tiny article that hasn't expanded because there isn't anything to say about it other than "this is a product, this is what it is like, and this is who makes it". Apparently it isn't made anywhere anymore, so it probably won't see much improvement here. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  08:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability is not temporary. Top-selling consumer product for many years, with significant press coverage in the relevant business sector; the problem is not whether adequate sourcing exists (>700 GBooks hits, for example), but separating out the nontrivial coverage from the ubiquitous passing mentions. Article needs significant improvement, of course. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Edward321 (talk) 03:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * My cat hates it, but tens of millions of other felines love it. This has been an extremely well-known and blockbuster-sale product.  It is a notable brand name.  Keep. Bearian (talk) 17:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.