Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tendulkar-Fleming Trophy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Missvain (talk) 22:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Tendulkar-Fleming Trophy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article seems to be a WP:HOAX. Concerns about the authenticity of the trophy have been raised with the Cricket Project and the article's creator. The creator has not responded to their talkpage or provided any WP:RS to back-up the article. A tag for speedy deletion was removed by the article's creator without any rationale.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a hoax. Speedy delete tag was deleted by article creator, who has refused to engage with us, and there are no sources that this trophy exists/is going to exist in the future. The "trophy image" is just a random photo of a blank trophy, and so it seems they're deliberately trying to created a plausible looking hoax article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. No evidence of existence. Only conclusion can be that this is a hoax. wjematherplease leave a message... 18:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - the page creator has no right to remove the speedy deletion tag. This is a blatant hoax and I don't think we should wait 7 days for deletion. Spiderone  18:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete The author has blanked the page. It is indeed a hoax article. I have restored the CSD template that author had removed without reason. --Walrus Ji (talk) 18:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.