Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenfu Tea Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keeep. Rlendog (talk) 18:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Tenfu Tea Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This organization does not seem notable. I can't find any good sources for it. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I found this from the Miami Herald, which appears to be an entire article on the Museum, although I can't view the full text. May be a press release, though; the same text appears in The Charlotte Observer and the Malaysia Star. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep World's largest tea museum. I found two entire articles devoted to it and added as references. Judging from nominator's other nominations of articles created by this user they should perhaps read WP:BEFORE.--Pontificalibus (talk) 22:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Umm... actually Anna is one of our best editors when it comes to China-related articles and their retention - it was the fact that she had nominated it for deletion, rather than another editor, that suggested to me that the sources I uncovered might not be sufficient. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 08:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * She said on my talk page that she doesn't search Chinese-language sources, so you might want to make your own policy-based assessments of her China-related nominations in future.--Pontificalibus (talk) 09:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, good advice. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources added by Pontificalibus. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  17:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  03:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep It appears that the concerns originally raised by the nominator have been addressed. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.