Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tengine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  03:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Tengine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested Prod rm with no reason given. I have not been able to trace any reliable sources for this concept so, at the moment, it seems to be a neologism and fails WP:V. TerriersFan (talk) 21:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of reliable sources. X Marx the Spot (talk) 21:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources, looks sketchy. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  21:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources that I could find. The only Tengine I could dig up was something to do with transistors. -- Whpq (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if this was sourced and verifiable, it would be a dictdef.  --Lockley (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.