Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Tens


Contested prod. Original reason for prod: ''No reliable sources (cited book doesn't exist). Looks suspiciously like Something made up in school'' – Gurch 17:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. New book title was added, but a book that only shows as available from one single Norwegian website looks dubious, and uncheckable. I don't know if this is real or not. I do know it can't be Verified from Reliable Sources. -- Fan-1967 18:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above. Cite something sufficiently published to be picked up at a local library. RichMac (Talk) 18:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If it isn't "according to Hoyle".... Akradecki 20:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Point "tens" and "Tens" at "TENS", as before.Pol098 01:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability and impossible to verify. But, oh the possibilies...hmm, lets see: "Tens, as in one step beyond 'dressing to the nines'?"  Or perhaps, "the meal right before Elevenses"?  Or better yet, how about, "Tens, as in the number of people who have heard of this before?" Wavy G 02:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.