Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teo Olivares


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unsourced BLP = mandatory deletion.  Sandstein  20:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Teo Olivares

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actor. Completely unsourced WP:BLP (and has been since its creation) that does not pass WP:NACTOR (no "significant" – e.g. main cast in a TV series – roles). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete IMDb is not a reliable source, so there are no reliable sources at all here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete He was in Geography Club (film), and has one article about him in his local newspaper (about him being in the movie) and the rest if coverage about the film or mere mentions about him being a reaccuring character on television shows. Does not meet WP:ACTORBIO. Missvain (talk) 00:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: The actor has had enough significant supporting roles in notable TV and film productions that I believe he meets WP:NACTOR—for example, appearing in 44 out of the total 55 episodes of Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide, and roles in Geography Club, Tiger Eyes and Legendary. However, sources are needed. Dflaw4 (talk) 08:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No – WP:NACTOR says "significant" roles – "recurring" roles are almost never significant. His role on Ned was virtually non-speaking until the third season – that's not "significant". The lack of in-depth coverage means the other roles weren't significant either. And subject certainly fails WP:BASIC, in addition to failing WP:NACTOR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I think some recurring roles are definitely significant. But if you disagree with me, that's fine; simply vote to "delete", as other editors have. Dflaw4 (talk) 09:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I nominated it, so I clearly already think it's a "delete". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I see. Then presumably you automatically disagree with any "Keep" opinion. Dflaw4 (talk) 23:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.