Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teoh Wey Yang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. MuZemike 19:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Teoh Wey Yang

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF, nothing in gnews and a co-contributor to a few articles. can't see how this 29 year old academic passes the mark. seems like a self promotion article. only gets 2 hits on the university's own website. LibStar (talk) 06:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No actual coverage of the person was found, apart from wikipedia mirrors. Comes up in searches from his papers, but doesn't appear to have done anything to meet WP:ACADEMIC. Quantpole (talk) 11:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 15:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 01:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. GS gives h index = 5. Article is too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete. Per nom and Quantpole. I agree with Xxanthippe; article created too early.--Eric Yurken (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another post-doc with a way-too-early page – starting to snow. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete too soon. JBsupreme (talk) 06:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.