Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tera Bond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. WjBscribe 19:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Tera Bond

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN porn actress. Fails WP:PORNBIO. Dismas |(talk) 15:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly speedy - no reason for us to think she passes WP:PORNBIO and no assertion of notability. Moreschi Request a recording? 15:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. Tabercil 22:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Over 75 movies, independent sourcing and a biography. Passes WP:BIO. Dekkappai 23:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete no notability at all. Keep Apparently, judging by other recently closed porn star AfDs, appearing in a few porn mags does establish notability. Epbr123 22:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Dekkappai, over 75 movies. Not a candidate for speedy deletion. "Is a porn star" is an assertation of notability.  --Oakshade 00:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Daniel Bryant  04:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Per everyone else. Acalamari 22:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing here indicates that she satisfies any of the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Article makes nearly no effort to establish notability. Caknuck 17:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "Just another porn star" apparently covers it. Article (and biography - from danni.com?) has no information beyond physical description. A web search doesn't show any more than that; lots of pictures, but no text. Nothing that any seconday sources wrote anything about her, no awards, 76 films isn't nothing, but neither is it exceptional. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 05:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dekkappai. Personally I would like to see this developed further.  RFerreira 05:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.