Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa Halbach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Steven_Avery. JoshuaZ 18:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Teresa Halbach

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Halbach is a victim of a murder. The case can be arguably notable, but that's because of the murderer it appears, not because of her. I don't see any evidence that says she is notable, only that her being murdered was somewhat notable. Metros 23:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect  to The Steven Avery Trial. She is not notable outside the murder case. Her name being mentioned in the article on her killer and his trial seems sufficient. Dr bab 23:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note The Steven Avery Trial redirects to Steven Avery. Metros 23:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply You're right, I didn't notice. Then the proper redirect would be to Steven_Avery or perhaps Steven_Avery.Dr bab 23:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Titles of cited articles contain her name and not that of the accused. Being the subject of media coverage makes her notable. ~ Infrangible 00:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, but all murder victims get some form of coverage in local newspapers. There are thousands of Teresa Halbachs out there (not literally, but I mean thousands of people who are victims of murder), so should we write articles on each one of them because they were talked about in their local area newspaper?  Metros 00:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect or Merge into The Steven Avery Trail.  ~  Wi ki  her mit   00:56, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Steven Avery Trial. Non-notable aside from being the victim of a violent crime. Not enough biographical information available to satisfy WP:BLP. -- Kesh 05:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. News conflated with encyclopedic content. Again. Eusebeus 15:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.