Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terese Nielsen (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Terese Nielsen
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. Some minor/passing coverage does exist in news sources, but not enough to meet the definition of WP:N in my opinion. Falls flat. JBsupreme ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 16:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails WP:CREATIVE. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  02:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  —J Greb (talk) 13:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak, weak keep--as I said in the previous AfD. I see no reason to change my mind, though I am disappointed that no one saw fit to add the sources mentioned previously. Drmies (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If you have the soureces, than you should add them per WP:BURDEN. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  22:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, you have them too now--there's a link to the Google Archive search at Articles for deletion/Terese Nielsen, but I'm sure you found all those, given WP:BEFORE. Enjoy! Drmies (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Like I stated in my nomination, there are some passing mentions, but nothing substantial. Here we are.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 04:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. She is both a comic book artist who has produced notable work (Ruins) and one of the most well-known and popular Magic: The Gathering artists. Furthermore, "Terese Nielsen" gets over 200,000 hits on Google. —Lowellian (reply) 23:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lowellian. BOZ (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.