Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terfenol

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Redirect to Terfenol-D. Deathphoenix 04:32, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Terfenol
No references at all and unencyclopaedic. Obviously, if someone can make this article better, do it! --Neigel von Teighen 20:12, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * A quick Google search turned up the link I've included, and lots more. Maybe the article should be called Terfenol-D. I've made some minor mods (now I'm going to stub it). Not sure what "unencyclopaedic" means in this context. By the way, the time it took to make the minor changes and search out a link was probably not that much longer than it took to put a vote for deletion on it. I vote it is not deleted. Arcturus 20:24, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, cleanup and expand. @ Megan1967 01:38, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm now interested in what else this alloy is about. I'd say it is encyclopedic. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:43, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * KeepRJFJR 00:10, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep in present form. Move to Terfenol-D (leaving Terfenol as a redirect. Dpbsmith (talk) 03:03, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect work carried out. Arcturus 12:15, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, merge histories, and make a new redirect Terfenol&rarr;Terfenol-D to fix the cut and paste move. Sigh. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 14:15, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.