Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teri O'Neill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 09:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Teri O'Neill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails to demonstrate that WP:GNG is met. A local politician has no inherent notability. Only one ref discusses subject but not in any depth. Contested PROD. Since I prodded, there's been one new source with some substance but not enough to achieve GNG.  Schwede 66  08:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Member of the Wellington City Council. --Enos733 (talk) 14:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm confused by your comment, Enos733. I'm sure anybody commenting here would read the article first and yes, that is what they would find out about the subject. What is your rationale for making that comment? What does it mean? What does it add to this AfD?  Schwede 66  17:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * My comment is two fold. First, it provides a placeholder comment about the best possible claim of meeting and the standard upon which to judge WP:NPOL. For local officials, we regularly do consider city size, not as the criteria, but as a criteria (especially for mayors and councilmebers from global cities). When the nom states "local politician" without context, it takes community members an additional click to understand the context of the discussion. --Enos733 (talk) 04:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wellington NZ is not a large or internationally prominent enough city to hand its city councillors an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL. At this level, getting a city councillor into Wikipedia requires the ability to demonstrate that she is substantively a special case of significantly greater nationalized or internationalized notability than the norm for city councillors — but this article is neither stating nor sourcing anything that would demonstrate that. Note that only one other current member of Wellington City Council has an article at all (who?), and it's also up for deletion for the same reason. Bearcat (talk) 20:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Inclined to agree, but who is the other current councillor with an article up for deletion? Hugo999 (talk) 01:14, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Tamatha Paul; has already been deleted.  Schwede 66  18:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete it is time to end special pleading and to make all members of city councils pass or fall on GNG, and O'Neill falls.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:27, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete subject clearly does not meet notability guidelines. Kiwichris (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.