Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terminology used in the Traditionalist Catholic debate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirected to Traditionalist Catholic; no content merged (yet) because I have no idea where the hell this should be merged, I'm not an expert on the subject, and Traditionalist Catholic is protected. Johnleemk | Talk 11:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Terminology used in the Traditionalist Catholic debate
Most of these terms are used on other pages in Wikipedia. Many of them are not included in the Traditional Catholic article anyway. I think this was created with good intentions but this is not deserving of a page of it's own. Dominick (TALK) 14:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC) }}

Please vote following the standard WP:AFD process. Dominick (TALK) 12:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

To make this easier, I modify my vote to Delete and Merge into the correct article. Dominick (TALK) 22:37, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

"This latter definition has been adopted in the relevant Wikipedia articles, including this one," says the article, thus taking sides on the controversial question of the definition of "traditionalist Catholic". Such a point-of-view article is inadmissible in Wikipedia, and should be eliminated.

In addition, the article says that "using the 'wrong' term can cause considerable irritation or offence." Thus, by its own admission, this article, which is mainly about the "wrong" or insulting terms, is almost bound to cause considerable irritation and offence, and should be eliminated.

Lima 20:43, 3 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Should we read that as a Delete vote? Dominick (TALK) 19:22, 4 December 2005 (UTC) Yes. I don't think there is anything worth merging that is not already in the associated articles.Lima 19:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge any relevant info from here into applicable other articles, but it doesn't really deserve its own article. *Dan T.* 16:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge anything that should be kept into the articles they belong in. JG of Borg 22:33, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge per Dtobias and JGofBorg. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  02:34, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge per above or fork/transwiki to wiktionary as appropriate. Each term is, 1) Something that can be explained well enough in a sentence or two to be used in any article, with no dedicated article or definition needed (the merge/delete case), 2)the term for a concept so important it deserves its own article (fork), or 3)the term for a concept that just needs a definition, in which case the wiki-dictionary and not the wiki-encyclopedia is its home.  Regardless, the concept of "terminology used in the Traditionalist Catholic debate" doesn't strike me as something that an encyclopedia article can actually be written about, and I don't think anything much more than a redirect begins at a page whose title begins with "terminology".  The Literate Engineer 04:57, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.