Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ternopil State Medical University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 09:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Ternopil State Medical University

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:03, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Copyvio of their own website. Presumably we ought to have an article about any university, but this one needs complete rewrite based on neutral independent sources Noyster  (talk),  16:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. If it's a copyvio then reduce it to a stub and start again, but it's clearly notable as a degree-awarding institution. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Necrothesp. VMS Mosaic (talk) 01:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * None of us like the content, if we keep a stub isn't it open for the offending content to be easily restored? Doesn't WP:BLOWITUP apply in a case like this? Not being disputatious, just finding my way round this AfD scene Noyster  (talk),  10:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The institute itself has the elements of notability, the article is just badly written. Refs are also clearly available in Google. Chhandama (talk) 11:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:42, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, with a request that a Russian and/or Ukrainian speaking editor remove copyvios and paraphrase in moderation. Universities are almost always notable. I can't seem to access the university website so don't know its language., please note that WP:BLOWITUP is an essay, and opinions of its persuasiveness vary among experienced editors. It is neither policy nor guideline. In my view, that essay would apply more in the case of an ambitious young singer than in the current case of a medical school. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  09:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Necrothesp and others. -- do ncr  am  17:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.