Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terotechnology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. A valid rationale for deletion relative to Wikipedia's Deletion policy is not present. For example, per WP:NEXIST, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America1000 13:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Terotechnology

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The sole reference does not work. Kind regards, JJK2000 (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Notable term defined everywhere with RS WP:NEXIST Books: Maintenance management and terotechnology and Terotechnology XI and Quality Control and Total Quality Management and Maintenance Management and Terotechnology'' Lightburst (talk) 03:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The article does need significant cleanup—however, the sources Lightburst provided seem to indicate that this isn't a non-notable term, and that it is widely used in technological fields. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 04:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.