Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrance O'Sullivan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 00:40, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Terrance O'Sullivan
delete not notable enough Mayumashu 03:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the last sentence indicates a vanity article. --djrobgordon 04:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep unless unverifiable. Listing by multiple independent sources as leading figure in his profession ought to be sufficient to demonstrate notability. Article certainly asserts notability. So fix it. Monicasdude 04:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for vanity and notability. Leroy Jenkins 07:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as it seems that the man is at least somewhat well known in the area in which he works. Certainly could use some work, but very salvagable. TheConsortium 08:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity and nn. --Ter e nce Ong 11:46, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unremarkable vanity. -- Krash (Talk) 01:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep only if verified / cleaned up. If it comes back to AfD in a few months, delete. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 01:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * delete nn Brcreel 04:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's a copyvio (actually I can't believe no one checked this) from with about 3 words changed and a sense of humour inserted. Unfortunately we didn't catch it quickly enough to WP:SPEEDY it away. Cursive 23:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn -- Alpha269 17:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.