Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence Keeley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Terrence Keeley

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sourcing is PR and routine business items. Also reads like a resume. Oaktree b (talk) 23:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 23:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not finding the sources for GNG. I find either routine business news (X took on/left Y position) and those all seem to be reprints of press releases. He did get a lengthy review of his book at "Pensions & Investments" but that does not seem to be a major publication. There was another book review in the National Review. I suppose we could consider NAUTH (book was published by Columbia Business School) but I still think it's thin. One book, two reviews. Lamona (talk) 02:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Lamona fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I wonder why this article has nominated for deletion. He has featured in an independent secondary reliable sources with a significant coverage. []CNBC, [] Bloomberg, [] Fordham University News, [] Business Insider and [] Wall Street Journal are enough to establish notability. Again the position held as former BlackRock Executive and books he published can highly quantify him to have notability.  Monoclinicva (talk) 14:5, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The articles you list have short quotes of him. (Although I can't see the WSJ article so maybe that has more.) We need at least two independent substantial articles ABOUT him - which means not interviews. I only find one book by him, so if you have found more please post a link. Lamona (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: We're equally split between keep and delete. Relisting for more discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 12:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep This has pass general notability of living person. Considering NAUTH This article has pass GNG
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete A resume entry of someone who has written a few op-eds. No secondary coverage, non-notable WP:BLP. SportingFlyer  T · C  13:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep A lot of independence sources. His publication as an author can qualify this article.
 * 102.91.5.57 (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.