Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terri Psiakis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 03:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Terri Psiakis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, nearly contentless stub that fails to assert notability. I was unable to find any references to substantiate her apparent claim to fame as a sometime guest radio and tv presenter. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:CREATIVE. Trusilver 07:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * keep regular performer at the Melbourne international comedy festival, with reviews in major news papers, ie see some here or here? The-Pope (talk) 13:59, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Below is a sample of other available sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep hard to verify the sources, but seems like it has WP:POTENTIAL. If she's written a book and it's been reviewed, there's the beginnings of a good article to be written. Worst case, merge this to an article about her book. Vcessayist (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Weak keep hard to verify the sources, but seems like it has WP:POTENTIAL. If she's written a book and it's been reviewed, there's the beginnings of a good article to be written. Worst case, merge this to an article about her book. Vcessayist (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Weak keep hard to verify the sources, but seems like it has WP:POTENTIAL. If she's written a book and it's been reviewed, there's the beginnings of a good article to be written. Worst case, merge this to an article about her book. Vcessayist (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Weak keep hard to verify the sources, but seems like it has WP:POTENTIAL. If she's written a book and it's been reviewed, there's the beginnings of a good article to be written. Worst case, merge this to an article about her book. Vcessayist (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.