Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrisa Bukovinac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I see a consensus here to Keep this article, such as it is. If you are interested in converting this page to a Redirect, you can start a discussion on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Terrisa Bukovinac

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete. There appear to be two claims to fame here. Running against Joe Biden and being the executive director of Democrats for Life. Candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates per se — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one. There is no evidence that Bukovinac's candidacy will meet any sort of historic record or ten year test. It's raised funds equal to the value of a half-decent used car. The second claim to notability would be as the executive director of Democrats for Life. I don't believe being the executive director of the organization itself warrants notability given their form 990 cited on Wikipedia gives them annual revenues in the 5 figure range which much like figures of major parties turned minor parties, does not meet GNG and warrant an article. Mpen320 (talk) 04:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Mpen320 is correct that this fails NPOL. However, as that guideline notes, candidates "can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline." A review of the references in the article demonstrates that with coverage in outlets like the NY Times, HuffPost, AP, etc, that the subject passes GNG, and a quick DuckDuckGo search shows there is additional content that could be added as well. --Slugger O&#39;Toole (talk) 04:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Reply Except she GNG too. Most of that coverage is run of the mill coverage any minor presidential candidate would get. It doesn't separate her from most of the 1,200 candidates declared with the FEC.--Mpen320 (talk) 13:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Allegedly taking home a box of aborted fetuses isn't routine coverage, see below... I wish I was making this up. Oaktree b (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Michigan,  and Washington, D.C..  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: She's notable, but not for NPOL. The article glosses over certain facts, but she appears to have taken home aborted fetuses, , , which borders NCRIME. Oaktree b (talk) 14:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Even clicking on the NYT link above gives five hits in the New York Times. Oaktree b (talk) 14:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable per GNG. A quick Google search reveals many articles from reliable sources.  I took the liberty of adding some of them to the article.  Dhalsim2 (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable for quite a lot of reasons; article has a wide variety of good quality sources demonstrating this. Chessrat  ( talk, contributions ) 23:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep per GNG. Even if she fails NPOL as a minor presidential candidate, she has had adequate coverage in reliable sources outside of her campaign, specifically regarding the aforementioned crime. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting to solicit more thoughtful opinions. I'm not sure any criminal charges is sufficient to establish notability as laid out by Wikipedia notability guidelines. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Democrats for Life of America . This will preserve her edit history in case she demonstrates more notability in the future.--Kerbyki (talk) 19:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Soft keep. She borderline meets WP:GNG but it's close.  ~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 19:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: I believe she meets the criteria for notability. DocZach (talk) 02:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.