Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terror Bass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. KaisaL (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Terror Bass

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This musicians how to pass WP:NMUSICIAN?. There doesn't appear to be much in the way of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources and those included in the article are questionable at best (and some patently unreliable.) A search brought up little else actually related to this person. I also searched on Google which gave even fewer results. Idolmm (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep - I would not argue with anyone who cites the WP:TOOSOON standard, but these guys have made the hip hop news for a couple of high-profile collaborations with Lil Jon and Carnage. They tend to be merely introduced in these sources but the sources (like XXL, Hot New Hip Hop, Vents, etc.) are viable in themselves. They also have a starter profile at AllMusic. They would benefit from some more coverage that is specifically about them in detail, but I think there may be enough for a stub article now. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 18:59, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as they have received coverage in reliable sources as detailed above such as WP:WikiProject Music approved sources such as XXL, HOT New Hip Hop, AllMusic and others, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment from previous voter - If my "weak keep" vote above is a reason for the apparent lack of consensus, consider it to be a true keep vote. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete There is literally no coverage of this duo at all in the sources provided, just mentions of the name. There is no way this could be called "substantial coverage". I did some searching and all I could find was this promotional material . Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Disagree with the last poster as the references have more than just name mentions and in total equate to significant coverage in reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.