Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrorfakt (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite 01:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Terrorfakt
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable band; long history of COI edits and general unsourced "information" Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  03:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. A quick search of google turns up numerous articles on the band. The band is signed to a notable record label, and has multiple albums readily available on most major internet music sites. The band easily meets Numbers 4, 5, and 6 of the criteria listed in WP:MUSIC. Rivetheadx 22:19, 03 March 20010.
 * So fix it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:30, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * A quick check of the article history will reveal that my efforts are frequently undone by others. The band is notable, but the article definitely needs major work. Work that I'm not capable of performing on my own.Rivetheadx 22:38, 03 March 20010.
 * If you mean fix it by adding references no one really reads or cares about to an article, why bother? The band is clearly notable, and anyone that wants something added to the article can do it themselves.   D r e a m Focus  07:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Contempt for references? I care deeply about references, and read them often enough. Abductive  (reasoning) 08:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Keep As acknowledged above needs Wikification--Jemesouviens32 (talk) 06:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep anyone with an internet connection can quickly see that the band is notable. Article very much needs an overhaul, though.Tanzmitlaibach 15:20 4 March 2010 UTC —Preceding undated comment added 15:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability is easy to verify as everyone else has noted. Issues with COI and poor article quality are not necessarily reasons for deletion. Instead, they are reasons for community editing and improvement. The recently-added edit tags are the proper solution for now. Perhaps we could discuss calling in the rescue squad too. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 17:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Criteria establishing notability was covered the first time the article was tagged. Rehashing it is pointless. Article may be a trainwreck, but notability can't be questioned. Doomsdayer520's suggestion to call in the rescue squad in seconded. Parabellum90417:27 4 March 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC).
 * The Rescue Squad has been called in! D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 17:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep They are signed a major record label, and have released multiple albums. Clicking on Google news search at the top of the AFD shows some mention of them.   D r e a m Focus  07:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.